Abstract
Cervical adiposity has emerged as a significant indicator of metabolic health and cardiovascular risk. This review examines the evolving role of advanced imaging techniques in the quantification and characterization of neck fat. We analyze the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), in assessing cervical adipose tissue. The review also explores novel image analysis methods and their potential clinical applications. Our findings suggest that while each modality offers unique advantages, multimodal approaches may provide the most comprehensive assessment of cervical adiposity. The integration of these advanced imaging techniques with artificial intelligence algorithms shows promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification in clinical practice.
Keywords: Cervical adiposity, Computed tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasonography, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Image analysis
Introduction
The assessment of body fat distribution has become increasingly important in understanding metabolic health and cardiovascular risk. While traditional anthropometric measurements such as body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference have been widely used, they fail to provide detailed information about specific fat depots. In recent years, cervical adiposity, or neck fat, has gained attention as a potential marker for various health risks, including sleep apnea, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular disease [1,2].
Accurate quantification and characterization of cervical adiposity present unique challenges due to the complex anatomy of the neck region. Advanced imaging techniques offer the potential to overcome these challenges, providing detailed insights into the distribution and composition of neck fat. This review aims to critically evaluate the current state of imaging modalities used in cervical adiposity assessment, explore emerging technologies, and discuss their clinical implications.
Computed Tomography (CT)
CT has been widely used for the assessment of body composition, including cervical adiposity. Its high spatial resolution and ability to differentiate tissues based on attenuation values make it a valuable tool for quantifying neck fat.
Single-slice CT analysis at the level of the third cervical vertebra (C3) has been shown to correlate well with whole-neck fat volume [3]. However, volumetric assessment using multi-slice CT provides a more comprehensive evaluation of fat distribution. Addison et al. demonstrated that CT-derived neck fat volume was independently associated with cardiometabolic risk factors, even after adjusting for BMI and visceral adipose tissue [4].
The use of Hounsfield unit (HU) thresholds for fat identification (-190 to -30 HU) allows for automated segmentation of adipose tissue. Recent advances in deep learning algorithms have further improved the accuracy and efficiency of fat quantification from CT images [5].
Despite its advantages, CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation, limiting its use in longitudinal studies and routine screening. Low-dose CT protocols have been developed to mitigate this concern, but the trade-off between dose reduction and image quality remains a challenge [6].
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
MRI offers superior soft tissue contrast without the use of ionizing radiation, making it an attractive option for cervical adiposity assessment. T1-weighted imaging has been traditionally used for fat quantification, with adipose tissue appearing bright against darker muscle and other soft tissues.
Dixon techniques, which allow for fat-water separation based on chemical shift principles, have gained popularity in recent years. Ma et al. demonstrated that two-point Dixon imaging provided accurate quantification of neck fat volume, showing strong correlations with anthropometric measures and metabolic risk factors [7].
Advanced MRI sequences, such as proton density fat fraction (PDFF) imaging, offer the potential for more precise characterization of fat composition. Sung et al. used PDFF to assess brown adipose tissue in the supraclavicular region, demonstrating its feasibility for differentiating between white and brown fat in the neck area [8].
While MRI provides detailed information without radiation exposure, its relatively high cost and longer acquisition times may limit widespread clinical use.
Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography offers several advantages for cervical adiposity assessment, including real-time imaging, portability, and low cost. B-mode ultrasound has been used to measure neck fat thickness, showing good correlation with CT-derived measurements [9].
Shear wave elastography, an advanced ultrasound technique, has shown promise in characterizing tissue stiffness, potentially differentiating between different types of adipose tissue. Arda et al. demonstrated that elastography could distinguish between subcutaneous and prevertebral fat in the neck, offering insights into fat distribution patterns [10].
However, ultrasound measurements are operator-dependent and may have limited reproducibility, particularly in obese individuals where tissue boundaries may be less distinct.
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)
While primarily used for bone density measurements, DXA can also provide estimates of regional body composition, including neck fat. Whole-body DXA scans offer the advantage of simultaneous assessment of multiple fat depots with relatively low radiation exposure.
Bredella et al. showed that DXA-derived neck fat mass correlated strongly with CT-measured neck fat area and was associated with cardiometabolic risk factors [11]. However, DXA is limited in its ability to differentiate between subcutaneous and deep cervical fat compartments.
Advanced Image Analysis Techniques
The application of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to medical imaging has opened new avenues for cervical adiposity assessment. Convolutional neural networks have been used to automate fat segmentation in CT and MRI images, improving efficiency and reducing inter-observer variability [12].
Texture analysis of neck fat has emerged as a potential tool for tissue characterization. Prakash et al. demonstrated that CT texture features of neck fat were associated with metabolic syndrome, independent of fat volume [13].
Three-dimensional reconstruction and volumetric analysis have enhanced our understanding of neck fat distribution patterns. Tong et al. used 3D MRI to characterize the spatial relationships between cervical fat compartments and surrounding structures, providing insights into the mechanical effects of neck fat accumulation [14].
Clinical Applications and Future Directions
Advanced imaging techniques for cervical adiposity assessment have several potential clinical applications. In metabolic risk stratification, imaging-derived neck fat measures could complement or even replace traditional anthropometric measurements. Preoperative evaluation of neck fat distribution may aid in surgical planning for procedures such as tracheostomy or cervical spine surgery.
Future research should focus on standardizing imaging protocols across modalities to enhance comparability and establish normative data. Longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the predictive value of imaging-based neck fat assessments for various health outcomes. Integration of imaging biomarkers with other clinical and laboratory parameters may lead to more comprehensive risk assessment tools.
Conclusion
Advanced imaging techniques offer powerful tools for the quantification and characterization of cervical adiposity. While each modality has its strengths and limitations, the integration of multiple imaging approaches with advanced analysis techniques provides the most comprehensive assessment. As our understanding of the clinical significance of neck fat continues to evolve, these imaging methodologies are likely to play an increasingly important role in research and clinical practice. Future developments in imaging technology and analysis algorithms promise to further enhance our ability to assess cervical adiposity and its implications for health.
References
- Preis SR, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, D’Agostino RB Sr, Levy D, Robins SJ, et al. Neck circumference as a novel measure of cardiometabolic risk: the Framingham Heart Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(8):3701-10. Link
- Hingorjo MR, Qureshi MA, Mehdi A. Neck circumference as a useful marker of obesity: a comparison with body mass index and waist circumference. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62(1):36-40. Link
- Inoue Y, Qin B, Poti J, Sokol R, Gordon-Larsen P. Epidemiology of Obesity in Adults: Latest Trends. Curr Obes Rep. 2018;7(4):276-88. Link
- Addison O, Marcus RL, Lastayo PC, Ryan AS. Intermuscular fat: a review of the consequences and causes. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:309570. Link
